Sea level rise, changing snow and rainfall patterns, and warmer waters are some of the changes already observed in the Estuary and expected to continue through the rest of the century as greenhouse gas concentrations rise. Changes to water are at the heart of the documented and further expected impacts; there’s less of it entering the system overall, but more arriving in torrential bursts, and more saltwater creeping inland from the Bay. The scope of the research is expansive even for a review article, in part because climate changes aren’t happening in isolation from other threats and habitat impacts. Writing in San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, the authors attempt to summarize not only all known research about climate change impacts on several upper estuarine ecosystems, but incorporate examples of impacts on two native fish species, as well as caveats accounting for the compounded impacts of other modern disruptions to the Estuary. Lead author Bruce Herbold expressed hope that instead of dealing with each subsequent drought, hot spell, and flood “on an emergency-by-emergency basis,” policymakers will shift to anticipating extreme conditions that threaten the Estuary’s ecosystems and species. The authors suggest focusing policy strategies on what the region can control: monitoring, habitat restoration, and to an extent, water flows. The larger issue at hand—the rapid pace of global change—is wisely counted outside the influence of Estuary managers and scientists.
 
“At the very least,” the paper concludes, “we need to consider our science and management in the context of environmental extremes as the new normal.”

Pearls in the ocean of information that our reporters didn’t want you to miss
Image courtesy of Bruce Herbold
 

Climate change is heating, salinizing, and expanding the San Francisco Estuary, a review of nearly 200 scientific studies concludes.

Sea level rise, changing snow and rainfall patterns, and warmer waters are some of the changes already observed in the Estuary and expected to continue through the rest of the century as greenhouse gas concentrations rise. Changes to water are at the heart of the documented and further expected impacts; there’s less of it entering the system overall, but more arriving in torrential bursts, and more saltwater creeping inland from the Bay. The scope of the research is expansive even for a review article, in part because climate changes aren’t happening in isolation from other threats and habitat impacts. Writing in San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, the authors attempt to summarize not only all known research about climate change impacts on several upper estuarine ecosystems, but incorporate examples of impacts on two native fish species, as well as caveats accounting for the compounded impacts of other modern disruptions to the Estuary. Lead author Bruce Herbold expressed hope that instead of dealing with each subsequent drought, hot spell, and flood “on an emergency-by-emergency basis,” policymakers will shift to anticipating extreme conditions that threaten the Estuary’s ecosystems and species. The authors suggest focusing policy strategies on what the region can control: monitoring, habitat restoration, and to an extent, water flows. The larger issue at hand—the rapid pace of global change—is wisely counted outside the influence of Estuary managers and scientists.
 
“At the very least,” the paper concludes, “we need to consider our science and management in the context of environmental extremes as the new normal.”

About the author

Sierra Garcia is an interdisciplinary marine scientist and environmental writer with a focus on oceans, climate, and communities. She is Estuary's multiplatforms editor, and does outreach and planning as well as some reporting for the magazine. Her work has appeared in publications serving a wide range of audiences, including Grist, JSTOR Daily, and the Oxford Climate Review. She was proudly born and raised in Monterey County.

Related Posts

Groundwater pumped from subsided islands back into Delta channels through 200 or more active outfalls can be laden with excess nitrogen transported from island soils, report the authors of a new study.

The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta contains more than 50 peat islands. Most have subsided—some as much as three meters — as a result of drainage for farming, and must maintain artificial water tables below the land surface via managed pumping. According to researchers from the University of California at Santa Cruz...

A large pulse of water sent through the Yolo Bypass in summer 2016 boosted phytoplankton biomass and food web conditions in Cache Slough and the lower Sacramento River, a new report confirms.

 “Our goal was to improve estuarine habitat by increasing net flows through the Cache Slough Complex to enhance downstream transport of lower trophic-level resources, an important driver for fish such as the endangered Delta Smelt,” write the authors—including esteemed (and recently retired) California Department of Water Resources lead scientist Ted...

New research indicates that survival of juvenile Chinook salmon in the Sacramento River system can be significantly boosted by achieving key thresholds for river flow.

The findings, published in the journal Ecosphere, add important context to the general scientific understanding that more water in the river improves fish survival. Previous studies, the authors explain in their paper, have demonstrated that more juvenile salmon migrating toward the sea complete their journey when the Sacramento River system...