Estuary News

June 2022
June 2022

Cutting Green Tape

A novel exemption lawmakers passed to California’s landmark Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in late 2021 has helped fast-track at least four habitat restoration projects so far, with more to follow in the next couple years. The Statutory Exemption for Restoration Projects, or SERP, offers a rare reprieve from California’s stringent environmental review and permitting process — and a clear indication of the urgency the state’s leaders feel in advancing ecological restoration work.

“When [SERP] passed, it was a little bit controversial,” says Sara Johnson, executive director of the fledgling California Ecological Business Association. Sluggish regulatory approval timelines are the top grievance member organizations of the association share, she said at the Society for Ecological Restoration’s conference in Carmel Valley in May.

Landscape surrounding Lakeville Creek in Sonoma County, an early beneficiary of SERP approval process . Photo Courtesy Julian Meisler, Sonoma Land Trust.
Landscape surrounding Lakeville Creek in Sonoma County, an early beneficiary of SERP approval process . Photo Courtesy Julian Meisler, Sonoma Land Trust.

“Right now it’s supposed to take two to three years to approve a [conservation or mitigation] bank, but it takes five or more,” she added. “It’s chilling investment in the space.” Conservation and mitigation banks sell preemptive habitat restoration work credits to offset environmental impacts in a different place. As of 2021, 87 banks throughout the state contained 67,879 acres of habitat.

It’s not just industry perception. A 2019 internal summary of California’s Department of Fish and Wildlife budget found that the agency is understaffed across the board, with the Species and Habitat Conservation branch needing an estimated fourfold increase in staffing to meet its target timelines for duties like processing permits. 

SERP beneficiaries have to get a final sign-off from Fish and Wildlife, but first have the exemption approved by a separate “lead agency” like the California Coastal Commission. 

Exempting beneficial habitat-conservation projects from the lengthy CEQA approval is part of a larger effort within California conservation regulations called “Cutting the Green Tape.” Although only a handful of restoration projects have been approved through SERP so far, there are dozens of others in the pipeline, according to Fish & Wildlife Deputy director Chad Dibble. He estimates that one or two projects per month could receive SERP approval as staff and applicants grow more comfortable with the process.

“[We’re trying to] maximize restoration opportunities that are true restoration and fit the letter of the statute,” says Dibble, adding that some beneficial restoration projects, like those mandated for mitigation, may also qualify for SERP. “It’s really important for us to have multiple environmental review and permitting  tools available to fit different projects rather than trying to cram every project into one tool.”

The exemption is set to expire on the first day of 2025, leaving less than three years for agencies to prove to lawmakers that accelerating beneficial projects for habitat is possible without letting questionable actors circumvent full environmental impact assessment obligations. 

Upstream of the Garcia River estuary restoration project in Mendocino County, the first in the state to be granted SERP approval. Photo Courtesy The Nature Conservancy/© Bridget Besaw.
Upstream of the Garcia River estuary restoration project in Mendocino County, the first in the state to be granted SERP approval. Photo Courtesy The Nature Conservancy/© Bridget Besaw.

In the meantime, SERP may be just an early gust of a tailwind nudging the restoration of California’s creeks, wetlands, and dunes forward. At press time, a new bill labeled AB 2362 (dubbed the “Publicly and environmentally beneficial projects” bill) is moving through the legislative revision process, which could further smooth permitting for ecosystem restoration. The growing appetite for these projects is likely tied to the recognition that the state’s twin goals of combating carbon emissions and protecting Californians from their impacts can both be met with robust green and blue infrastructure, and signals a possible heyday for ecological restoration on the horizon.

“We need resiliency, and we need restoration of a lot of areas to support our fish and wildlife and plant communities,” Dibble adds. “We’re all benefiting as Californians [from restoration].”

Top image: Lakeville Creek in Sonoma County, where one of the first restoration projects approved through the SERP process will soon break ground. Photo: Sonoma Land Trust.

Other Links

Statutory Exemption for Restoration Projects

AB2362

 

About the author

Sierra Garcia is an interdisciplinary marine scientist and environmental writer with a focus on oceans, climate, and communities. She is Estuary's multiplatforms editor, and does outreach and planning as well as some reporting for the magazine. Her work has appeared in publications serving a wide range of audiences, including Grist, JSTOR Daily, and the Oxford Climate Review. She was proudly born and raised in Monterey County.

Related Posts

Finding Her Way to Fish: Denise Colombano

The path into a career is not always a straightforward one. “I hated school. I mean, hated school,” says Denise Colombano, a postdoctoral fellow and Delta Science Fellow working on fisheries research at UC Berkeley. Today, Colombano feels that it is important to talk about her story as a way...
Over time, the median actual flow to San Francisco Bay in the ecologically critical winter and spring months has declined to less than half of the unimpaired runoff. This bar chart divides actual inflow (the amount that actually made it to the Bay) and unimpaired runoff (the inflow to the Bay that would occur if there were no dams or diversions) into quintiles from wettest to dry, and marks years drier than 2015 (roughly, the driest 2% of years) as “super-critically dry” years. Over the last 54 years, “super-critically dry” runoff conditions in the Bay’s watershed occurred naturally only once, in 1977, but the Estuary received runoff volumes in the super-critical range in 22 years, or 40% of the time. Overall, flow volumes characteristic of the driest 20% of years now occur more than half the time as a result of storage and diversion of runoff for consumptive uses. Source: The Bay Institute, based on data from California Department of Water Resources.

Defining Unimpaired Flows

For the second time in four years, a proposal for a voluntary agreement between agencies and water contractors on flows into and through the Delta from the San Joaquin and Sacramento rivers and their tributaries is wending its way through the State Water Resources Control Board. The proposal, which would...

Building Buy-in for Restoration

The success of a restoration project is in the eye of the beholder. Take the recently revitalized salt marsh edging Drift Creek in Alsea Bay, Oregon. To ecologists, the sight of new channels winding through bare, brown mud is a thing of beauty, heralding the abundance of life to come,...