An interdisciplinary scientist trained in marine ecology, with experience in policy, management, and public outreach, Foley assumed leadership late last year of the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP). Along with overseeing the RMP’s rigorous efforts to study and manage Bay pollutants, Foley who comes to the RMP from New Zealand’s Auckland Council, where she used long-term environmental monitoring data to inform both regional and national management and policy strategies, says she’ll draw on her social-science background to include the public in the program’s work. That means calling upon citizens for data collection and getting them involved in improving the health of the Bay, right where they live or work. “We try to develop integrated programs that are not just looking at the Bay, but looking upstream and into the watershed,” says Foley. “Citizen science can be really important as a way to link those efforts from the top of the mountains to the Bay.”As it closes out its third decade staring down climate change and increasingly complex pollutants, however, the program needs continued—and expanded—support, Foley says. “The cost of science to inform decisions continues to increase. Federal funding to support this work, however, is not keeping pace. We want to achieve cost-effective and multi-benefit solutions to water-quality issues.”

Pearls in the ocean of information that our reporters didn’t want you to miss
 

Melissa Foley's list of concerns as the new head of San Francisco Bay’s premier water-quality program is long: microplastics, pharmaceuticals, PFASs, and other chemicals and contaminants entering the Bay through runoff and treated sewage.

An interdisciplinary scientist trained in marine ecology, with experience in policy, management, and public outreach, Foley assumed leadership late last year of the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP). Along with overseeing the RMP’s rigorous efforts to study and manage Bay pollutants, Foley who comes to the RMP from New Zealand’s Auckland Council, where she used long-term environmental monitoring data to inform both regional and national management and policy strategies, says she’ll draw on her social-science background to include the public in the program’s work. That means calling upon citizens for data collection and getting them involved in improving the health of the Bay, right where they live or work. “We try to develop integrated programs that are not just looking at the Bay, but looking upstream and into the watershed,” says Foley. “Citizen science can be really important as a way to link those efforts from the top of the mountains to the Bay.”As it closes out its third decade staring down climate change and increasingly complex pollutants, however, the program needs continued—and expanded—support, Foley says. “The cost of science to inform decisions continues to increase. Federal funding to support this work, however, is not keeping pace. We want to achieve cost-effective and multi-benefit solutions to water-quality issues.”

About the author

Nate Seltenrich is a freelance science and environmental journalist who covers infrastructure, restoration, and related topics for Estuary. He also contributes to the San Francisco Chronicle, Sonoma and Marin magazines, the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, and other local and national publications, on subjects ranging from public lands and renewable energy to the human health impacts of climate change. He lives in Petaluma with his wife, two boys, and four ducks. www.nate-reports.com

Related Posts

subisdence on 4 delta islands map

Asked to suggest an appropriate future for four Delta islands owned by the Metropolitan Water District, it’s difficult not to want the moon.

Why not richer rice fields, more wetlands, better boat launches, extended trails, even eco-tourism? ? A new survey for the Delta Islands Adaptation Project, funded by a Prop 1 Watershed Restoration Grant, wants the public’s opinion on the importance of 10 possible land-use objectives leading to the selection of one...
chart by Hutton

An examination of 50 years of records reveals an apparent seasonal bias in estimates of freshwater flow from the Delta to the San Francisco Estuary.

The seasonal bias suggests flows were overestimated during the summer months and underestimated during the winter. Estimates of Delta outflow use a measurement called net Delta outflow index (NDOI), which is determined by taking the amount of Delta inflow, from sources such as the Calaveras, Sacramento, and San Joaquin rivers,...
diagram of fish net trawl

Fish monitoring surveys in the San Francisco Estuary net different numbers of different fish species depending upon when and how they sample.

According to a new study published in San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, even surveys that target the same part of the water column can come up with significantly different catches. The study’s authors analyzed decades worth of data from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Fall Midwater...