March 2015 CoverDOWNLOAD MARCH 2015 ISSUE PDF

Copper Effects on Salmon Influenced by Salinity

by Joe Eaton

Nietzsche was wrong:
 what doesn’t kill you doesn’t necessarily make you stronger. Sublethal doses of toxic copper can reduce a salmon’s chances of survival, but new research suggests impacts may be different in saltier water.

Juvenile coho in freshwater phase, pre-smolting. Photo: NOAA Fisheries.
Juvenile coho in freshwater phase, pre-smolting.
Photo: NOAA Fisheries.

A decade of research by David Baldwin of NOAA’s North
west Fisheries Science Center 
and other biologists has shown
 that in some situations, very 
low levels of dissolved copper interfere with a salmon’s ability to detect smells. This can 
be a matter of life or death: 
salmon rely on their olfac
tory sense to avoid predators,
 locate prey, and home in on
 their natal streams when they 
return from the ocean to spawn. Earlier studies involved juvenile fish in freshwater settings. Baldwin’s latest project, funded by the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay and the Copper Development Association, suggests things are different in brackish and salt water. At salinities that a young salmon is likely to encounter in San Francisco Bay, even copper concentrations well above the current water quality objective had no effect on test subjects’ olfactory function.

“As freshwater fish move into the estuary they become, in effect, protected from copper,” says Baldwin.

Copper enters the watershed via wastewater discharges, as well as urban and agricultural runoff (some pesticides contain copper), and automobile brake pads. The use of copper in brake pads is now being phased out thanks to state legislation and the efforts of the Brake Pad Partnership (parallel efforts are also in the national pipeline).

To protect all the beneficial uses of Bay, the state’s site-specific water quality objectives are 6.9 micrograms per liter (μg/L) for the South Bay and 6.0 μg/L for the Central Bay and San Pablo and Suisun Bays.

Recent RMP measurements indicate that dissolved copper levels in the Bay are under 
4 μg/L, close to
what studies in
 the 1970s found.
 However, concentrations as low as 3 μg/L have been implicated in behavioral impairment in juvenile salmon in freshwater. They can’t detect the chemicals released when another fish is attacked by a predator, and don’t take evasive action.

FishOnRig-web400To tease out effects on fish, Baldwin has worked with juveniles
— smolts — of both Chinook salmon, a species that travels through the Bay and Delta, and coho, a coastal-stream spawner.  Smoltification is 
a complex process, changing the young fish’s appearance and physiology from a freshwater phase to a seawater phase to adapt it for life
at sea. Baldwin used electrodes to measure how a smolt’s olfactory system responded to a mix of amino acids after exposure to a strong solution of dissolved copper, 50 μg/L, at a salinity of 10 parts per thousand (ppt.) That salinity was chosen because it matches the salinity of the fish’s internal fluids and tissues, but it’s within the estuarine spectrum.

A seabound Chinook would encounter salinities of 2 ppt where the Sacramento River passes Rio Vista, 7 ppt in San Pablo Bay, and 30 ppt at the Golden Gate.

In Baldwin’s lab, while pre-smolted salmon tested in freshwater show a reduced olfac
tory response due
to copper exposure, when tested in 10 ppt there’s no reduction. Likewise, in their saltwater phase, copper exposures in 10 ppt appear to have no impact.

Previous freshwater work demonstrated copper olfactory toxicity in a salmon relative, the steelhead, the anadromous form of the rainbow trout. “I don’t see why the results of the estuarine/seawater work in coho and Chinook couldn’t be generalized to steelhead,” Baldwin adds. “It’s unlikely that the steelhead olfactory system is radically different.”

What’s not clear is whether salinity levels below 10 ppt would still
 be protective. And what about the returning adult salmon, seeking out water that smells like home? That research has yet to be done. But adults have less prolonged exposure to estuarine contaminants than smolts. “Smolts use the estuary as an arena to feed and rear, trying to decide ‘Am I really ready to go out in the ocean?’” Baldwin explains. Adults, however, don’t dither around on their way to the spawning grounds.

CONTACT: David Baldwin, [email protected]; RMP: Phil Trowbridge, [email protected]

NEXT STORY: Cullinan Finally in the Fold

About the author

Joe Eaton writes about endangered and invasive species, climate and ecosystem science, environmental history, and water issues for ESTUARY. He is also "a semi-obsessive birder" whose pursuit of rarities has taken him to many of California's shores, wetlands, and sewage plants.

Related Posts

blue whale feeding

Blue Whales Consume Microplastic Particles by the Billion

The age of humans, termed the Anthropocene, might just as well be considered the age of plastic. The dangerously durable material, made ubiquitous in products and packaging through the late 20th century, has inundated our planet’s environment. Today, miniscule plastic pieces are present in deep-ocean sediment, high-mountain snow and just about...

Sharing Science Across Barriers

Growing up on Chicago’s South Side, an urban landscape of metal and concrete, Miguel Mendez had limited access to open spaces, and always dreamed of traveling. Yet there in the city, he got his first introduction to environmentalism. “In some of the places I lived in Chicago, environmental activists are...

The Long Haul to Restore San Joaquin Spring-Run Chinook

When a team of fish biologists was tasked with restoring spring-run Chinook salmon in the San Joaquin River in 2006, none of them quite knew where to begin. The thirsty farms that crowd the river on both sides had taken almost all the water out of it most years since...