Estuary News

February 2022

Science in Short: Daylighting Delta Data

Interview with Sam Bashevkin

Once you know how many fish are present in a particular part of a river, including additional details like the time of day and water temperature, what do you do with this information?

For decades, Delta researchers have collected millions of similar data points from daily visits to the San Francisco Estuary, not all of which are available or immediately useful. How that information is then translated into a language relevant to water and conservation managers requires serious number, or data, crunching.

Sam Bashevkin, senior environmental scientist at the Delta Science Program in the Delta Stewardship Council, is working to bring data science to the San Francisco Estuary and help to make sense of the overwhelming data troves generated by field researchers. “Whether it’s an explanation for why the world is as it is or why some ecological function is performing a certain way … that’s what we’re trying to extract out of the big swath of data out there,” Bashevkin says. “It’s really a form of storytelling.”

Originally from Vermont, Bashevkin relocated to California in 2014 for a PhD program at UC Davis. While studying ecology, he noted the difficulties associated with analyzing and understanding the story behind complex data sets. He soon realized that he enjoyed experimenting with sophisticated computer software tools more than collecting the data itself and gravitated towards data science.

Bashevkin joined the Delta Science Program in 2019 and has been working to synthesize over 150 unique monitoring efforts in the Bay-Delta system ever since. According to Steven Culberson, Lead Scientist of the Interagency Ecological Program, research and monitoring efforts across the Estuary are decentralized and involve a lot of different institutions and mandates. “Data scientists have helped us understand better ways to organize our programs, more efficient means of synthesizing data, and new ways to use higher quality datasets,” says Culberson.

Two examples of the variety of data collected in different ways for both monitoring and other activities in the Delta. Sources: (Left) Delta Smelt Conditions Report, DSC; (right) Jeanette Clark, National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis.

For Louise Conrad, the deputy executive officer of the Delta Stewardship Council’s Science Program, bringing data scientists like Bashevkin on board is helping to improve the accessibility, organization, documentation, and integration of data. “When we can look at related datasets as a whole, rather than one at a time, we get a more comprehensive view,” Conrad says. “To be prepared for new management and environmental challenges to come, we need to have a full picture of the Delta system.”

As data are better organized, described, and made available, the number of researchers and policymakers who see the usefulness of this data for their own purposes continues to grow. “It’s a foundation upon which repeatable conclusions can be made,” says Culberson.


Bay-Delta Monitoring Interactive Map App

Science Synthesis Delta Stewardship Council

Review of the Monitoring Enterprise in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, Delta Independent Science Board (2022).

Interagency Ecological Program Long-term Monitoring Element Review: Pilot approach and methods development (2020).

Delta Smelt Conditions Report DSC

About the author

Ashleigh Papp is a science writer based in San Francisco. She has a background in animal science and biology, she enjoys writing about emerging environmental issues, our oceans, and conservation-related science. For ESTUARY, she often covers wildlife. When not reading or writing, she's playing outside with friends or inside with her cat, Sandy.

Related Posts

subisdence on 4 delta islands map

Asked to suggest an appropriate future for four Delta islands owned by the Metropolitan Water District, it’s difficult not to want the moon.

Why not richer rice fields, more wetlands, better boat launches, extended trails, even eco-tourism? ? A new survey for the Delta Islands Adaptation Project, funded by a Prop 1 Watershed Restoration Grant, wants the public’s opinion on the importance of 10 possible land-use objectives leading to the selection of one...
chart by Hutton

An examination of 50 years of records reveals an apparent seasonal bias in estimates of freshwater flow from the Delta to the San Francisco Estuary.

The seasonal bias suggests flows were overestimated during the summer months and underestimated during the winter. Estimates of Delta outflow use a measurement called net Delta outflow index (NDOI), which is determined by taking the amount of Delta inflow, from sources such as the Calaveras, Sacramento, and San Joaquin rivers,...
diagram of fish net trawl

Fish monitoring surveys in the San Francisco Estuary net different numbers of different fish species depending upon when and how they sample.

According to a new study published in San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, even surveys that target the same part of the water column can come up with significantly different catches. The study’s authors analyzed decades worth of data from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Fall Midwater...