Estuary News

December 2019

Speakers discuss forward-looking science in a rapidly changing environment, and the neuroscience of persuading people to care about climate change.

State of the Estuary Conference: Climate Resilience Sessions

Climate Change Planning

Mark Gold made the ultimate comment in his opening plenary at the State of the Estuary Conference: “The age of incrementalism, and not moving forward in a bold way, is not getting it done in terms of climate change.” Gold, deputy secretary for ocean and coastal policy for the California Natural Resources Agency, outlined the state’s newly revised strategic plan for a bluer economy, coastal resilience, and rapid response to fisheries emergencies.

Following his talk, Geeta Persad of the Union of Concerned Scientists reviewed various challenges facing California. “Climate change is going to fundamentally transform where and when California gets its water,” she said.

Later, the Delta Stewardship Council’s Yumiko Henneberry asked a panel of scientists what their  top priorities were given current management questions. “Identifying areas that might be refugia from warming and understanding how they fit together will be increasingly important as environment changes,” responded U.S. Geological Survey’s Jessie Lacy.

“End-to-end ecosystem modeling that narrows down driving forces, acknowledges changes in natural variability, and puts current science into a more predictive framework,” said Delta Independent Science Board’s Steve Brandt.

“Recognizing traditional and local knowledge, and investing in social science capacity,” answered Ocean Science Trust’s Liz Whiteman.

An audience member asked what could be done to overcome “regulatory constipation.” U.S. Geological Survey’s Mike Chotkowski said to “encourage science with no strings attached.”

Climate Science Meets Neuroscience

Developing effective communication strategies around climate change is a critical challenge of the climate crisis. Persuading people to change their behavior, and to support climate change solutions and adaptation programs requires that they both understand the problem and be motivated to solve it. But according to poet, behavioral scientist, and Exploratorium fellow Pireeni Sundaralingam, we are building these strategies on a false foundation.

Speaking on “The Brain and Observation: Towards a Language of Resilience,” as part of the State of the Estuary Conference panel Public Learning in an Era of Climate Crisis, Sundaralingam said, “it’s a critical mistake to approach communication about climate change with the assumption that humans are rational actors.”

The key to persuasion, she said, is to understand the shape and type of heuristics that are at work. “If you’re trying to convince a human brain, it’s vital to know how information is going to be chunked and processed, otherwise your efforts are just wishful thinking.”

Read More

California Coast Draft Strategic Plan Sea Level Rise

Persad California Climate Plenary

San Francisco Bay Shoreline Climate Adaptation Atlas

Related Prior ESTUARY Stories

Special Issue on Resilient by Design Bay Area Challenge, June 2018

Constellation of California Climate Planning Events, Sept 2018

High Road for Wettest Highway-37, Sept 2017

Prepping for Sea Level Rise, Who’s on First, Sept 2017

Back to rest of issue

Receive ESTUARY News for FREE

Top Photo: Napa skies during Kincaid fire, 2019. Photo credit: Amber Manfree

Special coverage 2019 State of the Estuary Conference

Related Posts

subisdence on 4 delta islands map

Asked to suggest an appropriate future for four Delta islands owned by the Metropolitan Water District, it’s difficult not to want the moon.

Why not richer rice fields, more wetlands, better boat launches, extended trails, even eco-tourism? ? A new survey for the Delta Islands Adaptation Project, funded by a Prop 1 Watershed Restoration Grant, wants the public’s opinion on the importance of 10 possible land-use objectives leading to the selection of one...
chart by Hutton

An examination of 50 years of records reveals an apparent seasonal bias in estimates of freshwater flow from the Delta to the San Francisco Estuary.

The seasonal bias suggests flows were overestimated during the summer months and underestimated during the winter. Estimates of Delta outflow use a measurement called net Delta outflow index (NDOI), which is determined by taking the amount of Delta inflow, from sources such as the Calaveras, Sacramento, and San Joaquin rivers,...
diagram of fish net trawl

Fish monitoring surveys in the San Francisco Estuary net different numbers of different fish species depending upon when and how they sample.

According to a new study published in San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, even surveys that target the same part of the water column can come up with significantly different catches. The study’s authors analyzed decades worth of data from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Fall Midwater...